While the name Panvax conjures an image for some sort of urination collection retrieval system, eg – vacuum assisted bedpan, it is in fact the new vaccine produced by Australia’s Commonwealth Serum Laboratories (CSL), for combating the scourge of flying pigs (swine flu).
The first glimpses of the details for this product come from the Western Australian Government in a published Public Health Training PowerPoint presentation.(PDF file)
Lets start with the good news first. Panvax H1N1 is not to be confused with CSL’s previous Panvax product which was designed for Avian Influenza. Panvax H1N1 is a monovalent vaccine, indicating the use of one antigen only, for immunizing against (allegedly), one specific pandemic only. At this current time it is an unregistered (unapproved) vaccine in Australia. See slide 51 – Panvax Training
To repeat, the Australian Government in its infinite wisdom has granted an exemption allowing the dispensing of this vaccine, without it being approved by the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA). That’s the good news, for the moment, because what that means is that consent from the victim to be assaulted by vaccine, must be obtained and recorded in detail on special Commonwealth consent forms. So for the time being, there will be no mandatory, forced vaccinations in Australia.
It’s a novel concept (consent) when in reference to Government and H1N1 vaccinations. It appears that US citizens will have no such freedoms, documents that order incarceration at a quarantine detention facility in the event of vaccination non-compliance; from several US states including Florida have now been cited. To date only China has actually issued warrants for mass inoculations.
The second bit of good news for Australians is that this CSL H1N1 vaccine appears to have far less potential for crippling, maiming and killing the host body after injection. According to slide 17 – Panvax Training, Panvax H1N1 is "unadjuvanted".
According to Jeffry John Aufderheide of VacTRUTH, trials just underway (Sept 15, 09) in Colorado for an experimental H1N1 vaccine contain the adjuvant Squalene (MF59).
Squalene (fish oil) is readily digestible if taken orally. However when injected, the immune system responds to it with intensity because it resembles so closely the natural oils found in the body. The result is that the immune system becomes a deadly weapon of aggressive destruction against its own host body. More squalene info, see post Mandatory chemical weapon assault
The theory that vaccines prevent the spread of infectious disease is based upon the belief that, by injecting a small amount of a disease into the body, it will develop "antibodies".
The theory is complicated by the fact that attenuated doses of pathogens alone will not initiate an "antigenic response." So, vaccines contain compounds known as "adjuvants" to intensify the body’s immune response.
Attenuation - reducing the virulence of a pathogen, so that it becomes harmless or less virulent, but still keeping it viable (or 'live').
So how can the CSL Panvax be an effective vaccination without the adjuvant? The answer (if there was such a thing as an effective vaccination) may be that Panvax is not attenuated. It is claimed that Panvax is not a “live” vaccine. Technically it is true that it contains no complete live virus, just live virus portions. Note ingredients named include Haemagglutinin (influenza surface proteins) and subunits of H1N1, the live virus is disrupted by detergent to produce the subunits.
The first glimpses of the details for this product come from the Western Australian Government in a published Public Health Training PowerPoint presentation.(PDF file)
Lets start with the good news first. Panvax H1N1 is not to be confused with CSL’s previous Panvax product which was designed for Avian Influenza. Panvax H1N1 is a monovalent vaccine, indicating the use of one antigen only, for immunizing against (allegedly), one specific pandemic only. At this current time it is an unregistered (unapproved) vaccine in Australia. See slide 51 – Panvax Training
To repeat, the Australian Government in its infinite wisdom has granted an exemption allowing the dispensing of this vaccine, without it being approved by the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA). That’s the good news, for the moment, because what that means is that consent from the victim to be assaulted by vaccine, must be obtained and recorded in detail on special Commonwealth consent forms. So for the time being, there will be no mandatory, forced vaccinations in Australia.
It’s a novel concept (consent) when in reference to Government and H1N1 vaccinations. It appears that US citizens will have no such freedoms, documents that order incarceration at a quarantine detention facility in the event of vaccination non-compliance; from several US states including Florida have now been cited. To date only China has actually issued warrants for mass inoculations.
The second bit of good news for Australians is that this CSL H1N1 vaccine appears to have far less potential for crippling, maiming and killing the host body after injection. According to slide 17 – Panvax Training, Panvax H1N1 is "unadjuvanted".
According to Jeffry John Aufderheide of VacTRUTH, trials just underway (Sept 15, 09) in Colorado for an experimental H1N1 vaccine contain the adjuvant Squalene (MF59).
Squalene (fish oil) is readily digestible if taken orally. However when injected, the immune system responds to it with intensity because it resembles so closely the natural oils found in the body. The result is that the immune system becomes a deadly weapon of aggressive destruction against its own host body. More squalene info, see post Mandatory chemical weapon assault
The theory that vaccines prevent the spread of infectious disease is based upon the belief that, by injecting a small amount of a disease into the body, it will develop "antibodies".
The theory is complicated by the fact that attenuated doses of pathogens alone will not initiate an "antigenic response." So, vaccines contain compounds known as "adjuvants" to intensify the body’s immune response.
Attenuation - reducing the virulence of a pathogen, so that it becomes harmless or less virulent, but still keeping it viable (or 'live').
So how can the CSL Panvax be an effective vaccination without the adjuvant? The answer (if there was such a thing as an effective vaccination) may be that Panvax is not attenuated. It is claimed that Panvax is not a “live” vaccine. Technically it is true that it contains no complete live virus, just live virus portions. Note ingredients named include Haemagglutinin (influenza surface proteins) and subunits of H1N1, the live virus is disrupted by detergent to produce the subunits.
Panvax Formulation:
- Monovalent vaccine
- 15ug of antigen per 0.5mls
- Unadjuvanted
- 10ml Multi Dose Vials (containing thiomersal – compound partly composed of mercury and ethylmercury.
Each 0.5mls contains
- Sub units of A/California/7/2009 (H1N1) v-like virus
- 15ug haemagglutinin
- 0.01%w/v Thiomersal
- Sodium Chloride 4.1mg
- Sodium phosphate – dibasic anhydrous 0.3mg
- Sodium phosphate- monobasic 80ug
- Potassium chloride 20 ug
- Potassium phosphate – monobasic 20 ug
- Calcium chloride 1.5ug
- Taurodeoxycholate ≤ 5ug (Bile salt-related, anionic detergent) (can give red eyes, blurred vision etc)
- Ovalbumin ≤ 1.0ug
- Sucrose <10ug>
- Neomycin ≤ 0.7ug – check for allergies to this antibiotic
- Polymyxin B sulfate ≤0.11ng – check for allergies to this antibiotic
- Beta-propiolactone ≤1.4ng
It is interesting to note that the two antibiotics within Panvax, Neomycin and Polymyxin B Sulfate, are both used for the treatment of serious bacterial infection and are not effective against viral infection. Neomycin and Polymyxin B Sulfate are also both noted for serious side effects, predominantly kidney failure. Also interesting, or just wrong would be a better way to put it, it is warned both these antibiotics not be used by pregnant women. Neomycin is in the FDA pregnancy category D. This means that it is known to be harmful to an unborn baby. The problem is that in the “first tier” of candidates to receive this unregistered, unapproved vaccine, pregnant women are on top of the list.
More info about Neomycin and Polymyxin B Sulfate:
http://www.drugs.com/mtm/neomycin.html
http://www.rxlist.com/neomycin-sulfate-drug.htm
http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/druginfo/meds/a682274.html
http://www.drugs.com/cdi/polymyxin-b-sulfate.html
Probably the least dangerous possible side effect of Panvax is anaphylactic, egg allergy reaction. This is another difference between Panvax and the experimental vaccines being produced for the USA, where early reports detailed manufacturers utilizing stem cell technology to culture the vaccines. Panvax has used good old fashioned chick embryos (Ovalbumin).
More on the deadly side is the ingredient Beta-Propiolactone.
Ranked as one of the most hazardous compounds (worst 10%) to humans and "reasonably expected to be a human carcinogen" (International Agency for Research on Cancer - IARC, 1999). Once widely used in the manufacture of acrylic acid, its use has been mostly phased out in favor of safer alternatives. Βeta-Propiolactone is a disinfectant and has been used to sterilize blood plasma, vaccines, tissue grafts, surgical instruments, and enzymes.
Listed as a possible Panvax side effect in slide 66 – Panvax Training is Guillian-Barre Syndrome (nervous system disorder featuring paralysis).
Contaminants make vaccines tremendously dangerous. Swine flu vaccine (for a pandemic which never materialized) was contaminated with polio virus in 1976. Over 45 million Americans were vaccinated in just 77 days and although there were only 6 cases of Swine flu in the entire country the vaccine reportedly caused at least 565 cases of polio paralysis (renamed “Guillain-Barre Syndrome” for the occasion), 60 deaths and other serious problems, including blindness and impotence. (There is no reason to feel reassured because this particular disaster occurred in the past: every flu vaccine is capable of passing along Guillain-Barre (polio) and other unsuspected viral diseases.)"The Syringe of Death": Coming Soon to a Police Station near you
Rima E. Laibow, MD
Last but not least in the Panvax list of toxic ingredients is Thiomersal (by weight, 50% mercury). In slide 20 –Panvax Training, we are informed that:
According to the Commonwealth
"There is no evidence that thiomersal has caused any developmental or neurological abnormalities, such as ADHD or Autism."
Yet for something that has no relation to “neurological abnormalities”, in slide 28 –Panvax Training, It is recommended that all children under 10 years of age wait for the thiomersal free vaccine.
However slide 28 then continues:
Yes the vaccine is available to those ≥ 6 months of age and so if clients request the vaccine and are aware of the vaccine content they may receive the thiomersal vaccine with out waiting for the thiomersal free vaccine.
Ok, that’s great news, if you would like to poison your children, and you are aware that you are poisoning your children, feel free, vaccine dispensaries will oblige.
http://www.naturalnews.com/011764.html
Studies on thimerosal poisoning describe tubular necrosis and nervous system injury, including obtundation, coma and death. As a result of these findings, Russia banned thimerosal from children's vaccines in 1980. Denmark, Austria, Japan, Great Britain and all the Scandinavian countries have also banned the preservative.
Some scientists say the estimated number of cases of autism has increased 1,500 percent – since 1991, when the number of childhood vaccinations doubled. Whereas one in every 2,500 children was diagnosed with autism before 1991, one in 166 children now have the disease.
Editors Note – according to statistics from the Center for Disease Control (CDC), the number is as high as 1 in 152.
According to Tom Verstraeten, an epidemiologist who had analyzed the data on the CDC's database, thimerosal appeared to be responsible for a dramatic increase in autism and other neurological disorders.
However, given no causal relationship, the CDC and industry representatives were quick to discredit the evidence.
Consequently, the CDC paid the Institute of Medicine (IOM) to conduct another study on thimerosal. According to Robert F. Kennedy Jr., this study was fixed in order to "whitewash" previous findings. In its 2001 report, the IOM's Immunization Safety Review Committee did conclude that the link between thimerosal and neuro-developmental disorders was biologically plausible.
MMR Causes Autism – Another Win In US Federal Court
Julia a three year old US citizen has just won substantial compensation in the US Federal Court for autism caused by MMR (measles, mumps, reubella, chicken pox) vaccine – says her mother.
They kept the “autism” word out of the case. Many parents in other US cases have been advised to do this:
"CBS News has found that since 1988, the vaccine court has awarded money judgments, often in the millions of dollars, to thirteen hundred and twenty two families whose children suffered brain damage from vaccines. In many cases, the government paid out awards following a judicial finding that vaccine injury lead to the child’s autism spectrum disorder. In each of these cases, the plaintiffs’ attorneys made the tactical decision to opt out of the highly charged Omnibus Autism Proceedings and argue their autism cases in the regular vaccine court. In many other successful cases, attorneys elected to steer clear of the hot button autism issue altogether and seek recovery instead for the underlying brain damage that caused their client’s autism."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vaccine_court
Vaccine court is the popular term which refers to the Office of Special Masters of the U.S. Court of Federal Claims, which administers a no-fault system for litigating vaccine injury claims. These claims against vaccine manufacturers cannot normally be filed in state or federal civil courts, but instead must be heard in the Court of Claims, sitting without a jury.
See also:
http://www.whale.to/vaccine/king.html
Autism myth #1: Autism is a disorder whose cause is unknown.
Autism myth #2: Those having a diagnosis of autism or a diagnosis of mercury poisoning do not have the same symptoms.
Autism myth #3: Evidence is accumulating that autism is largely a genetic disorder (Szatmari 2008).
Autism myth #4: The families that have children who regressed into autism have always been anti-vaccine.
Autism myth #5: The autism “epidemic” does not represent a true increase in the disorder, but rather is an artifact of expanding the diagnosis (now referred to as autism spectrum disorder, ASD) and increased surveillance (Taylor 2006).
Autism myth #6: The science involving vaccines and autism is complex, making it difficult for the average person to sift through all the misdirection and misinformation.
Autism myth #7: Currently, the evidence leads to the firm conclusion that vaccines do not cause autism.
Vaccine myth #1: Vaccines are one of the most successful programs in modern health care, reducing, and in some cases even eliminating, serious infectious diseases.
Vaccine myth #2: Public support for the vaccination program remains strong, especially in the United States where vaccination rates are currently at an all-time high of greater than 95% (CDC 2004).
Vaccine myth #3: Despite a long history of safety and effectiveness, vaccines have always had their critics: some parents and a tiny fringe of doctors question whether vaccinating children is worth what they perceive as the risks.
Vaccine myth #4: Vaccines, like most medical interventions, are not without risk; however, the benefits far outweigh those risks.
Vaccine myth #5: There are multiple independent lines of evidence that indicate vaccines do not cause autism.
Vaccine myth #6: The findings in the epidemiological studies relied upon by the 2004 IOM have been proven to be scientifically sound.
Vaccine myth #7: Robert Kennedy Jr. and others point to dubious evidence, such as the myth that the Amish do not vaccinate and do not get autism. Both of these claims are not true, and the data RFK Jr. refers to is nothing more than a very unscientific phone survey (Leitch 2007).
Vaccine myth #8: A victory for the anti-vaccination activists would undermine public confidence in what is arguably the single most effective public health measure devised by modern science.
Vaccine myth #9: There is an anti-vaccination movement that threatens the effectiveness of public health programs.
Vaccine myth #10: The decrease in public confidence in the current U.S. national vaccination programs from the disclosure of the factual risks and harms inherent in each vaccine will lead, as it has before, to declining vaccination compliance and an increase in infectious disease.
Vaccine myth #11: The anti-vaccination movement is largely based on poor science; and fear mongering has become more vocal and even hostile (Hughes 2007)
Related blog posts:
Mandatory chemical weapon assault
Looming Pandemic
The horrors of vaccinations
No comments:
Post a Comment